Caribbean Court of Justice Grants Alex Tasker Special Leave to Challenge Extradition in Money Laundering Case

The Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) has tossed former insurance executive Alex Tasker a lifeline in his bid to avoid extradition to the United States over his alleged involvement in the Donville Inniss money laundering scheme.

The Trinidad-based court on Thursday granted Tasker special leave to challenge his extradition to the United States on charges of money laundering and conspiracy to launder money in a case in which Inniss, a former minister in the Freundel Stuart administration, was convicted in a US court.

The five-member panel of CCJ judges reopened its previous decision to refuse special permission to appeal and gave the green light to Tasker’s second bid to challenge extradition.

The CCJ, Barbados’ final appeal court, ruled that the matter will have to be sent back to the Barbados Court of Appeal for that court to exercise its own discretion and to determine afresh, the best way to deal with Tasker’s attempt to challenge a magistrate’s extradition order.

The CCJ traced the history of the case before outlining how it came to its latest decision.

The regional tribunal, headed by Justice Adrian Saunders, recalled that in September 2021, the former senior vice president for business development and marketing with the Insurance Corporation of Barbados (ICBL) was committed by a magistrate to surrender to US federal authorities to face money laundering charges there. Immediately after the committal, the magistrate, under Section 19 of the Extradition Act, advised Tasker on how he could challenge the decision and the time limit for doing so, the justices noted.

They said the accused made a challenge under the wrong law, and it was not until after the time limit had expired, that he filed the correct application.

But the Court of Appeal dismissed his application because it was filed late. It also held that it had no jurisdiction to hear Tasker’s application for leave to appeal because it lacked the power to consider whether time should be extended, or whether an appeal filed under the wrong law but within time should carry any weight.

The CCJ noted that the alleged money launderer then approached the CCJ seeking special permission to appeal these decisions of the Court of Appeal.

In July, relying on the papers filed but without holding an oral hearing, the CCJ refused Tasker special permission to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision, effectively ending his efforts to challenge the extradition order.